Could it really be possible to predict
the risk of a heart attack by doing a simple test at home that takes
less than a minute to perform? No need to get a CT scan, an
angiogram, or blood tests, but just a simple test that just about
anyone can do at home? It sounds too good to be true, but researchers
from the United Kingdom and China think otherwise, and they have
scientific proof.
The researchers started out with a simple hypothesis: the metabolic syndrome is related to an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular diseases (including risk of a heart attack). If there was a test that could be done at home that predicted the metabolic syndrome, then by extension this test will also predict an increased risk of heart disease.
The metabolic syndrome is a combination of risk factors that together greatly increase the risk of heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. It is diagnosed when a person has any three of the following: an elevated fasting blood sugar, elevated blood pressure (over 130 mmHg systolic), large waist circumference, low HDL (good) cholesterol levels, and high triglyceride levels. The primary symptom is increased girth around the waist, and the treatment consists primarily of weight loss and exercise. If there was a simple home test that could predict the metabolic syndrome, then this test would also predict an increased risk of a heart attack.
This research study was very simple and straightforward: measure the resting heart rate in over 30,000 people and see if it is related to the metabolic syndrome. It was. People with a resting heart rate of around 85 to 100 beats per minute had about twice the risk of metabolic syndrome compared to people with a resting heart rate of 60 to 70 beats per minute.
Well, there are no surprises here. Regular cardiovascular exercise tends to lower the heart rate, and regular exercise tends to lower the risk of the metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and a wide range of other health problems. I like this test-- measuring the resting heart rate-- because it is simple, costs nothing, and appears to accurately guage the risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes. But there are other similar tests that will do the same thing. Here's one: do you regularly exercise? If yes, your risk of disease is greatly reduced. If no, then it is time to change your habits.
Cool technology can create amazing pictures of your heart and the inside of your body, but do we always need these tests? No, but lots of people still think so. For example, research published in the New England Journal of Medicine suggests that CT screening for lung cancer saves lives, but is this really any better than simply telling people that if you smoke, you need to quit, and here's how? Screening tests don't prevent the development of disease, they only can identify it in its early stages. Changing behavior, however, will actually help prevent ever getting the disease.
This research linking the resting heart rate to an increased risk of developing the metabolic syndrome is a good start at putting technology in its place. Measure your resting heart rate for a week straight upon arising. Is it elevated? If yes, then it is likely you need to eat better and get more exercise. But wait a second, why don't we all do that anyway?
- Tom Heston, MD
The researchers started out with a simple hypothesis: the metabolic syndrome is related to an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular diseases (including risk of a heart attack). If there was a test that could be done at home that predicted the metabolic syndrome, then by extension this test will also predict an increased risk of heart disease.
The metabolic syndrome is a combination of risk factors that together greatly increase the risk of heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. It is diagnosed when a person has any three of the following: an elevated fasting blood sugar, elevated blood pressure (over 130 mmHg systolic), large waist circumference, low HDL (good) cholesterol levels, and high triglyceride levels. The primary symptom is increased girth around the waist, and the treatment consists primarily of weight loss and exercise. If there was a simple home test that could predict the metabolic syndrome, then this test would also predict an increased risk of a heart attack.
This research study was very simple and straightforward: measure the resting heart rate in over 30,000 people and see if it is related to the metabolic syndrome. It was. People with a resting heart rate of around 85 to 100 beats per minute had about twice the risk of metabolic syndrome compared to people with a resting heart rate of 60 to 70 beats per minute.
Well, there are no surprises here. Regular cardiovascular exercise tends to lower the heart rate, and regular exercise tends to lower the risk of the metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and a wide range of other health problems. I like this test-- measuring the resting heart rate-- because it is simple, costs nothing, and appears to accurately guage the risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes. But there are other similar tests that will do the same thing. Here's one: do you regularly exercise? If yes, your risk of disease is greatly reduced. If no, then it is time to change your habits.
Cool technology can create amazing pictures of your heart and the inside of your body, but do we always need these tests? No, but lots of people still think so. For example, research published in the New England Journal of Medicine suggests that CT screening for lung cancer saves lives, but is this really any better than simply telling people that if you smoke, you need to quit, and here's how? Screening tests don't prevent the development of disease, they only can identify it in its early stages. Changing behavior, however, will actually help prevent ever getting the disease.
This research linking the resting heart rate to an increased risk of developing the metabolic syndrome is a good start at putting technology in its place. Measure your resting heart rate for a week straight upon arising. Is it elevated? If yes, then it is likely you need to eat better and get more exercise. But wait a second, why don't we all do that anyway?
- Tom Heston, MD
